Trump, Russia and China – All You Need To Know

Even before he takes office, President-elect Trump is turning the world upside down.

It has become clear his attitude towards Russia and China is very different from that of his predecessors. Amazingly, he is already wresting power from the deep state, causing it great resentment, which under Obama, Clinton and the Bushes, ran geopolitical policy. From January, barring accidents the world will not be the same, the establishment up-ended.

This short article builds on information available to date and speculates how America’s relations with Russia and China are likely to evolve, and the implications for NATO and Europe. It attempts to cut through the disinformation and noise (from all sides) to assess how Trump will change super-power relations.

Russia

President-elect Trump has signalled his respect for President Putin as a leader, and Putin, who has been careful to not comment on the US presidential election, has indicated his respect for Trump. Furthermore, Trump, who admittedly said lots of contradictory statements to get elected, clearly wishes to reduce America’s funding commitment to NATO and to reduce American involvement in the Middle East. These objectives will obviously find favour with Putin, and could form the basis of a relationship reset between Russia and the West.

The American deep state was responsible for moving missiles within range of Moscow, under cover of targeting Tehran, in this year’s escalation of a new cold war. It follows the covert destabilisation by the US of Ukraine over the last decade and American backing for various terrorist groups in Syria, following Syria’s refusal to permit pipelines from the Gulf to cross her territory five years ago. Since the fall of the USSR, NATO has moved its eastern border to within 300 miles of Moscow. Elements in the CIA, working to their own agenda, are still trying to demonise Russia without any evidence, as the Washington Post story about Russian intervention in the election demonstrates.

The Trump team dismissed this attempt to blacken the Russians as disinformation, from the same sources that came up with the fiction of Saddam Hussain’s weapons of mass destruction. The timing of accusations over Russian involvement probably has much to do with influencing the electoral college’s votes, a last stand against Trump’s election, in which case the intervention is politically outrageous. But this is a side-show, and doubtless Trump will deal appropriately with those involved when he is in office.

Rather like super-tankers that need seven miles to stop, regional powers are also finding it hard to adjust to these new realities, but adjust they surely will. European governments and NATO members will have had background briefings, but the normal channels for this, the CIA, the US Military advisers and American diplomats are not on Trump’s page, so confusion still reigns. But one thing is becoming clear: Trump will not be diverted from a general policy of détente and de-escalation of military presence in both Europe and the Middle East.

The process of détente is reasonably predictable. A summit with Russia to agree strategic arms limitations (called SALT3 perhaps?) is a proven path to follow. It should be a step-by-step process scheduled over five or ten years, with pre-agreed conditions designed to satisfy concerns in the Baltic States and Poland that Russia might attempt border-creep. For their part the Russians must agree Ukraine’s independence (excepting the Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk, which should be formally ceded to Russia). Ukraine and Belorussia will be independent buffer states between Russia and the European Union. Under a SALT3 both NATO and Russia will agree to a phased withdraw of all military hardware other than limited ground troops and their associated equipment.

In the Middle East, America will concede that Syria remains in the Russian sphere of influence, and will withdraw all support for rebel organisations. This is no more than reality. China, doubtless, will help in the physical reconstruction of Syria in due course. Agreement will be sought as to the means of destroying Daesh. Beyond that, a reduced American presence in the region will continue to ensure security for Israel and the Gulf states. Already, the British have announced they will step up their presence in the region, which should also contribute to regional stability.

Iran should be persuaded by Russia to take a more constructive approach to peace with Sunni states, such as Saudi Arabia, and towards Israel. This could be difficult, but should be possible, given Iran has become considerably more moderate since the days of Ahmadinejad, particularly if the right tone from America is forthcoming. Iran’s days of hiding from western sanctions behind Russia will be over, and should be replaced with an emphasis on trade. And Saudi Arabia can no longer afford to wage wars, such as that in the Yemen, contributing to a less belligerent outcome.

All this is practical, possible and predictable. Behind the change in geopolitical reality for the Middle East is the fact that Peak Oil is being pushed further into the future. Not only are large new oil fields still being discovered (such as the Kashagan Field in the north of the Caspian Sea), but modern technology is bringing other forms of ecologically-friendly energy supplies on stream and higher prices will unlock shale oil supplies. The strategic importance of the Middle East has therefore declined, particularly since insignificant quantities of oil from the region go to America. And with that decline goes less need for geostrategic intervention by the US.

For the first time since the Six Day War in 1967 there is a realistic possibility of stability in the area, assuming the super-powers take a constructive approach to détente, and are willing to jointly police the region.

Regional implications of détente with Russia

The benefits of regional peace to the Middle East will, hopefully, materialise. Turkey is important, and will need to be considered as well. The coup attempt earlier this year, which was likely supported if not actually instigated by the US, has resulted in Erdogan tightening his grip on all opposition to his rule. However, Erdogan may have become Russia’s puppet, because the Russians appear to have tipped him off ahead of the coup and ensured its failure. If this is indeed the case, not only does he owe his power to Russia, but Russia can take it away. Under Russian influence, we can expect Turkey to continue to lean away from her impractical and unrealistic hopes of joining the EU, and instead pursue her more recent ambitions for membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. That would offer Turkey the best long-term future.

With Turkey’s future direction appearing to be decided, far more important is the effect of a reset with Russia on Europe and the European Union. As NATO members, European nations have gone along with Russian sanctions, which have been detrimental particularly to Germany’s economy. Their removal will give Germany a new long-term trade market of considerable potential, reducing her dependence on trade with other EU states, particularly France, Spain and Italy. The possibility of a new Hanseatic League, about which I wrote last March, is now on the cardsi. I was very surprised that it hadn’t been considered by the British Government and discussed with the Germans as a Plan B in the event of a vote for Brexit. However, the prospect of détente with Russia leads to a new Hanseatic League now becoming a realistic possibility.

Briefly, the trade route to Russia, both by sea through the Baltic and overland by rail and road, offers enormous trading potential for Germany, Britain, Holland, and Scandinavia. To this we can add Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Hungary, and to a lesser extent, Romania, Bulgaria and Serbia. Furthermore, a northern trade route will link into China’s One Belt One Road project, further enhancing its importance. In short, the long-term future of France, Spain, Italy and Greece will be challenged by the rehabilitation of Russian trade, and potentially become one of relative isolation. An overriding reason why Russia will become so important is because of her partnership with China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Russia is, with sub-Saharan Africa, the source of natural resources for China’s planned industrialisation of all Asia. And as a resource-rich country, Russia will benefit from the continuing rise in raw material and energy prices. Détente with America and NATO will improve her economic outlook considerably, but she needs European commercial technologies and manufacturing techniques to help rebuild her own middle class’s wealth.

The underlying reasons a SALT3 will work for Russia are all there, and Trump is likely to take the view that Western Europe should not be his responsibility. There is little US trade with Russia, so trade negotiations for America are not in this mix, simplifying matters considerably. The trade bun-fight will be mainly confined to negotiations with China.

We can be sure that there will be a summit between President Xi and President Trump early next year, because Henry Kissinger, who is trusted by the Chinese, and despite his great age has been sent by Trump to arrange it. Reports in the press that Kissinger’s visit last week was just to calm things down after Trump’s telephone call with the Taiwanese leader are wide of the mark. Trump is simply establishing his negotiating position from the outset.

Trump is of the opinion that businessmen, not diplomats, should control trade negotiations. While diplomats might view this approach as naïve, the fact is Trump will be setting the agenda. Consequently, he is likely to be dismissive of past agreements, and impatient with the snail’s pace common in diplomatic trade negotiations. He will most likely wish to handle trade negotiations with China himself.

In order that trade negotiations progress without misunderstandings he has nominated Iowa Governor Terry Branstad for the post of Ambassador to China. Branstad has known President Xi through previous visits, and should be an effective communications channel. That’s the soft part of the deal. The hard part is Trump’s rhetoric, and his willingness to talk to Taiwan, which has established his opening gambit. His objective will be to get China to stop manufacturing copies of American goods, hacking into commercial websites to steal trade and technological secrets, and abusing intellectual property. It is likely China will agree to tighten up on this behaviour, in which case a new trade agreement can be reached.

While diplomats might find Trump’s style damaging to their careful construction of trade relations over time, there is little doubt his approach has merit. Success with China, even if it is limited in scope, is likely to be the outcome. It could alter not only the way trade agreements with China are set in the future, but could override the whole WTO process for other international trade relationships as well. And here again, we see the EU with its antiquated and obstructive approach to trade being most challenged.

At the end of the day, Trump’s language is one the Chinese will understand, and in return for backing off over Taiwan, they are likely to concede America’s beef over intellectual property abuses, hacking and commercial espionage. China’s focus is moving away from that sort of business anyway, towards higher-level services and improved infrastructure for its rapidly-growing middle classes, and she plans to spread the benefits of her industrialisation throughout Asia.

Furthermore, there are likely to be echoes from Trump’s big-bang on trade. Removing diplomats from the act of setting the trade agenda, disconnects trade from geopolitical considerations generally, allowing Japan, for instance, to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. It is even conceivable that the US itself might apply to join it at a future date, in which case, you heard it here first.

Trump’s trade negotiations with China, if successful, could have far-reaching effects. They could, of course, go badly wrong, but the Chinese are realists and will almost certainly adapt to the new reality. It is in their interests to strike a deal with Trump, swiftly giving him concessions that established diplomatic practice would be unlikely to yield.

Political and economic consequences for America

In the first half of 2017, Trump is likely to achieve both détente with Russia and a new, better trade deal with China. If so, his pre-election stance, that the American establishment was failing the people, will have been amply proven. Trump will likely be riding high in the opinion polls.

However, you cannot demolish the status quo without consequences. While much good will be achieved if Trump’s approach to Russia and China succeeds, the EU will be undermined both politically and financially. The European Union is already threatening to break up following Brexit, and Trump’s détente with Russia could give Germany a realistic opportunity to cast off from the European Project. The financial cost of a European break-up will be a difficult pill for Germany to swallow, and renewed trade links with Britain and Russia is her best shot at recovery. The future for the euro, whatever happens, is being challenged, more so if Germany decides to replace it with a new Deutschemark. If Germany replaces the euro, the Eurozone’s banking system and currency will be increasingly vulnerable to collapse. And if the Eurozone has a banking crisis, it will inevitably infect the global banking system, undermining America’s banks as well.

If we make the optimistic assumption that somehow the Eurozone and its currency manage to stagger on, there is a further problem for America. Industrial raw material prices have been rising strongly throughout 2016, measured in dollars, despite the dollar’s strength against other currencies. Trump’s stated ambition, to cause US infrastructure investment to rise significantly, coincides with China’s thirteenth five-year plan for building new Silk Roads and associated projects. Consequently, both America and China will be aggressively bidding against each other for raw materials in 2017.

Price rises in raw materials and energy will become a major factor driving the rate of price inflation sharply higher on America’s Main Street. Yet the ability of the Fed to raise interest rates in their traditional attempts to limit price inflation will be checked by the height of the nominal rate that will trigger widespread debt liquidation. Debt, as the cliché goes, is the gorilla in the room.

Trump’s basic problem is that he understands business, but not necessarily economics. He obviously thinks that trade deficits arise from unfair trade practices. It’s a common mistake, but they don’t. They arise from unfunded government spending and the expansion of bank credit. His fundamental belief, that fair terms of trade will make America great again is therefore badly flawed.

It is also difficult to see where he stands on monetary policy, if at all. In business, he has personally benefited from the expansion of bank credit, but does he understand the eventual price consequences of unlimited expansion of bank credit? Very few businessmen do, in which case we can only hope he will be well advised.

Past US presidents, from Herbert Hoover onwards, have been generally poorly advised on basic economic theory, thinking the state is well equipped to fix things that go wrong. The evidence for this error is found in the unremitting accumulation of public sector debt since the Wall Street Crash in 1929, confirmed when Roosevelt devalued the dollar against gold in 1934, and reconfirmed when Nixon temporarily abandoned all gold convertibility in 1971. That Trump might be better advised must remain a pipe-dream, unless contradicted by events.

Therefore, my broad expectations for 2017, the first year of the Trump presidency, is success in foreign and trade policy will be offset by rising price inflation and falling asset prices as interest rates rise (see my article dated 1st December, Credit cycles and gold), terminating in a credit-crunch from higher nominal interest rates. Good on the geopolitics, bad on the economy.

Free "dummies guide" to trading options

Did you know trading options can actually be safer and more profitable than buying and selling stocks? Video and plain English training guide reveals how to get started tonight. 100% free.

Download now.

You May Also Like

About the Author: Tyler Durden

  • JohnDille

    IT DOES MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE WHO IS PRESIDENT OF THE USA… AND WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE CONGRESS AND OTHER ELECTED OFFICES!!! IF YOU DOUBT THAT… SIMPLY ASK YOURSELF… WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF AN IDIOT LIKE DONALD TRUMP HAD BEEN PRESIDENT DURING THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS?? PRETTY GOOD CHANCE THAT… IF DONALD TRUMP HAD BEEN PRESIDENT… THE HUMAN SPECIES OF TODAY WOULD BE TRYING TO SURVIVE AMIDST THE RADIOACTIVE RUINS OF WHAT HAD BEEN A FAIRLY ADVANCED CIVILIZATION!!! AND… ASK YOURSELF WHAT AMERICA WOULD BE LIKE IF REPUBLICANS TOTALLY CONTROLLED ALL THE LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL OFFICES… SO THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WERE DOING ALL THE WORK… AND SO THAT WAGES FOR ALMOST EVERYONE WERE A FRACTION OF WHAT THEY ARE TODAY… AND SO THAT THE RICH CONTROLLED AMERICA… JUST LIKE THE RICH CONTROLLED THE SOUTH IN THE DAYS BEFORE THE CONFERACY LED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH!!! THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TODAY HAS BASICALLY THE SAME BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES AS THE OLD SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS WHO SUPPORTED THE CONFEDERACY… AND THEN JIM CROW AND TOTAL SEGREGATION… WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CONSERVATIVE RICH REPUBLICANS WHO SUPPORTED ADOLPH HITLER AND BENITO MUSSOLINI…. AND THEIR POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AMND ECONOMIC POLICIES… ACTIVELY AND AGGRESSIVELY… ALL THROUGH THE 1930’S… AND RIGHT UP TO THE DAY THE JAPANESE ATTACKED PEARL HARBOR!!! DEMOCRATS OF TODAY HAVE SOME SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES… BUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS THE PARTY OF RICH FASCISTS AND WHITE SUPREMACIST RACISTS… AND OF TOTAL UNBRIDLED UNREGULATED GREED AND SELFISHNESS!!! AND ANYONE WHO DENIES ANY OF THAT… IS EITHER LYING, OR THEY HAVE NO CLUE WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT!

  • Scott

    Hey there Deck Chair. We got us a new bus driver. Take a little longer going over the cliff, but it’s still a comin. What you doin’ to make your life better? Face it, makes no difference who won or lost does it? You’re always pissed off. Shake it off and start enjoying life. After all, none of us gets out alive no matter who’s in office do they?

  • daniel1154

    38 Governors. Wow. Worse for the Democrats than I thought.

  • Girls_club

    Exactly Daniel.

  • Girls_club

    We have 38 Governors and control the Presidency, Senate and House.

  • Girls_club

    The dem party did NOT learn anything from the election. They are still using the OLD play book. The Republicans will continue to gain in the Senate, House, and Governorships.

  • Girls_club

    The blue collar working class finally woke-up and realized the dems have been using them only for their vote…………………

  • JohnDille

    ONE THING A PERSON SHOULD HAVE LEARNED BY NOW… MOST ESPECIALLY IN REAL ESTATE… BUT IT APPLIES ELSEWHERE… IS THE HORRENDOUS DANGERS OF USING LEVERAGE. THE WHOLE CRISIS THAT OBAMA INHERITED WAS THE DIRECT RESULT OF MASSIVE LEVERAGE BY THE REPUBLICANS WHO OWNED AND CONTROLLED THE US ECONOMIC… AND POLITICAL… SYSTEM FOR MOST OF THE DOZEN OR SO YEARS BEFORE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE!!! OF COURSE… WHEN THE ELEPHANTS… THE RICH AND POWERFUL… FIGHT, THE GRASS.. THE ORDINARY PEOPLE… ARE THE ONES WHO GET TRAMPLED!!!

  • JohnDille

    SO… THE RUSSIAN BEAR HAS LOST HIS FUR???? RUSSIA IS STILL RULED BY A DICTATOR, AND THAT DICTATOR WOULD BENEFIT BY DOING ANYTHING HE CAN DO TO UNDERMINE THE USA! BY HELPING DONALD TRUMP GET ELECTED, FOR A GOOD EXAMPLE!!! IMAGINE… PUTIN SEES TRUMP AS AN IDIOT THAT HE CAN CONTROL… AND HE IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT THAT!!! PAT TRUMP ON THE BACK AND COMPLIMENT HIM IN PUBLIC… AND PUTIN CAN QUIETLY INVADE HALF THE WORLD…AND TRUMP WILL STILL BE KISSING UP TO HIS BUDDY PUTIN!!! ITS RATHER AMUSING TO SEE JOE CABOT KISSING UP TO DICTATOLRS… PUTIN AND TRUMP… TOTALLY OBLIVIOUS TO THE IRONY OF HIS DOING SO!!! WHATEVER HAPPENED TO FREEDOM AND LIBERTY… BUT ONLY FOR THE RICH… WHICH IS YOU NORMAL POINT OF VIEW??? OH… WAIT… NO IRONY AT ALL… CABOT LOVES ECONOMIC… SOCIAL… AND POLITICAL DICTATORS.. ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE ROLLED INTO ONE PERSON… LIKE TRUM AND/OR PUTIN… OR INTO ONE GROUP… LIKE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS!!!

  • JohnDille

    SO… YOU ADMIT THAT TRUMP LOST!!! OR THAT TRUMP CHEATED BY GAMING THE SYSTEM!!! OR THAT TRUMP HAS NO RESPECT FOR ACTUAL DEMOCRACY!!! GLAD YOU FINALLY REALIZED THAT TRUMP IS A SCAM ARTIST CON ARTIST AND FRAUD!!! AND A CHEAT, TO BOOT!!!

  • daniel1154

    Neither candidate campaigned for the popular vote, so her getting more is irrelevant. If the campaign were for the popular vote Trump would not have been in New Hampshire 18 times and California none. If the campaign were for the popular vote, Trump would have won that too.

  • Joe Cabot

    You’ve got the comrade spinning in circles, trotting out every excuse in the democrat handbook, and generally making himself look like a political dinosaur. Well done.

  • JohnDille

    IS THAT WHY A VERY UNPOPULAR HILLARY CLINTON… NOT REALLY POPULAR EVEN AMONG DEMOCRTATS… STILL GOT ALMOST 3 MILLION MORE VOTES THAN DONALD TRUMP DID??? IS THAT WHY REPUBLICANS CONTROL THE HOUSE ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE GERRYMANDERED SO MANY STATES… AND THUS GET HUGE MAJORITIES IN THE HOUSE… EVEN THOUGH DEMOCRATS USUALLY GET MORE TOTAL VOTES THAN REPUBLICANS??? IS THAT WHY REPUBLICANS HAVE NOT WON AN OUTRIGHT SOLID MAJORITY IN TOTAL HOUSE, SENATE OR PRESIDENTIAL VOTES IN ALMOST 30 YEARS??? YOU REPUBLICANS ARE WHISTLING PAST THE GRAVEYARD… BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE MOST REPUBLICANS WILL SOON BE!!! THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS OLD AND NEARLY ALL WHITE… AND WILL BE IRRELEVANT BY 2028… AND MAYBE BY 2020 IF TRUMP IS AS BIG A DISASTER AS MOST DEMOCRATS EXPECT HIM TO BE!!! DONALD T-GRUMP IS THE HERBERT HOOVER OF OUR AGE… WHICH MEANS REPUBLICANS ARE LIKELY TO GET WASHED TOTALLY OFF THE MAP IN MOST OF THE NEXT 30 TO 40 YEARS!!! AND I CAN HARDLY WAIT!!!

  • daniel1154

    Dillie. Democrats cannot get elected anywhere except the big cities that they already destroyed. Top to bottom, the party is decimated and on the verge of being irrelevant.

  • JohnDille

    YEAH… THOSE EVIL DEMOCRATS ONLY BELIEVE WHAT IS TRUE!!! THEY JUST CANNOT COMPREHEND THE RIGHT WING REPUBLICAN FANTASY WORLD THAT YOU OBVIOUSLY LIVE IN!!! BY THE WAY… OVER 80% OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN AMERICA… LIVE IN URBAN AREAS!!! THE NUMBER LIVING IN REPUBLICAN DOMINATED RURAL AREAS REPRESENT ABOUT 20% OF THE POPULATION… ABOUT THE SAME AS 70 YEARS AGO!!! THE DIFFERENCE IS… OVER THOSE 70 YEARS, ALL THE SMART KIDS AND PEOPLE WITH ANY REAL POTENTIAL,,, HAVE MIGRATED TO THE BIG CITIES, AND NOW THEY MOSTLY VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS! THE DUMMIES AND THE LOSERS HAVE STAYED BEHIND IN THEIR SMALL TOWNS AND VILLAGES… AND OVERWHELMINGLY VOTE REPUBLICAN!!! AREN’T YOU PROUD TO BE A LOSER???

  • daniel1154

    You express what the Democrats believe. That is why white working people don’t vote Democrat any more, and why Democrats can’t win elections and are a tiny minority party, limited only to big cities.

  • JohnDille

    MOST WORKING PEOPLE ARE WOMEN OR BLACK OR BROWN OR GAY, OR SOME COMBINATION THEREOF! BY STANDING UP FOR THOSE PEOPLE… INSTEAD OF CRAPPING ON THEM LIKE REPUBLICANS DO… DEMOCRATS ARE STANDING UP FOR A MAJORITY… A LARGE MAJORITY… OF ALL WORKING PEOPLE!!! I GUESS YOU WHITE MALES FEEL SORRY FOR YOURSELVES BECAUSE YOU CAN NO LONGER CRAP ON OTHER PEOPLE… LIKE YOU USED TO DO… AND GET AWAY WTH IT!!! I GUESS YOU JUST CAN’T HANDLE ACTUAL REAL HONEST TO GOD COMPETITION FOR JOBS AND WAGES!!! AND EVEN DONALD TRUMP AND HIS WHITE SUPREMACIST SUPPORTERS ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO HELP YOU MUCH… BECAUSE WHITE NON HISPANIC MALES ONLY REPRESENT MAYBE 5% OF THE WORLD’S POPULATION… AND ALL THOSE OTHER 95% ARE NOW IN A POSITION TO LEAVE YOU SELF ENTITLED WHITE GUYS FAR FAR BEHIND… AND ARE DOING SO!!! WHITE MALE AMERICANS HAVE BEHAVED LIKE THE WORLD OWES THEM A LIVING OR MOST OF THE LST 100 YEARS OR SO… AND THE REST OF THE WORLD IS NOW IN A POSITION TO TELLL YOU WHERE TO GO!!! I AM A WHITE MALE… AN THUS A VICTIM OF THIS NEW REALITY… BUT AT LEAST I UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HPPENING AND WHY!!! WHICH IS WHY I WOULD LAUGH AT YOU REPUBLICAN IDIOTS AND PUPPETS… EXCEPT THAT YOUR STUPIDITY HURTS ME AT LEAST AS MUCH AS IT WILL HURT YOU!!!

  • daniel1154

    Isn’t it just that the Democrat party doesn’t care about them anymore, and ignores them in favor of feminists, the homosexual lobby, black lives matter, and the other extreme fringe groups that make up the Democrat party these days?

  • JohnDille

    BECAUSE SUPER RICH RIGHT WINGERS… LIKE THE KOCH BROTHERS AND THEIR MANY SUPER RICH ALLIES… ARE SPENDING BILLIONS ON BRAIN WASHING ANYONE DUMB ENOUGH TO LISTEN TO THEIR LIES AND BALONEY AND STEER MANURE!!! AND AS HITLER AND STALIN…. AND NOW THE REPUBLICAN PARTY… CAN TELL YOU… TOTALLY BRAZEN LIES… SPEWED ENDLESSLY… MANY DOZENS OF TIMES PER DAY… WORKS!!! CLEALY, THAT WORKED ON YOU… UNLESS YOU WERE JUST BORN STUPID!!!

  • daniel1154

    How come blue collar working people vote Republican now instead of Democrat Dillie? How did the Democrats lose them?

  • Joe Cabot

    It’s rather amusing to watch the old-school types who are still allowing their favorite politicians to be afraid of the big, bad Russians, and that any type of relationship with them will threaten the survival of the United States. It’s almost as if these deep thinkers are not aware that the USSR no longer exists, that it went down if flames for economic reasons, and that a rebirth of a Russian superpower is not possible because of said economic reasons.

  • Eileen

    One thing a person learns very quickly in real estate, especially commercial (and I am including rental properties) is the power of leverage. Trump is using that in his foreign policy and I expect that his use of it will improve our relations with belligerent countries, like Iran.

  • JohnDille

    ITS HARD TO TELL IF THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY A RUSSIAN AGENT TRYING TO SUBLIMINALLY TELL AMERICANS WHAT TO THINK, IN ORDER TO HELP RUSSIA OVERTHROW THE USA… OR WRITTEN BY A RIGHT WINGER WHO WANTS TO GET RICH BY WORKING AGAINST THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE USA!!! EITHER WAY, DONALD TRUMP OUGHT TO HIRE THE WRITER TO GIVE HIM ADVICE ON HOW TO UNDERMINE THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND HELP RUSSIA REGAIN ITS SUPER POWER STATUS!!! THAT IS WHAT REPUBLICANS SEEM HADE BENT ON DOING!!! AND THEY CALL THEMSELVES PATRIOTS!!! MOSTLY THEY ARE JUST GREEDY SELFISH AMERICA HATING IDIOTS!!!